For more writing information, please visit our writing pages.
These evaluative criteria were developed by Dr. David Barndollar for a sophomore-level English course. The same five concerns are addressed at each grade level:
- quality of ideas
- development and organization
- language and word choice
- mechanics, and style
A Grade
Demonstrates unusual competence:
- an ability to avoid the obvious and thus gain insights that are individual and often illuminating
- a capacity to develop ideas flexibly and fluently, yet with control and purpose
- a special concern for the bon mot, even if it entails coining a word that the language does not provide
- an ability to use punctuation rhetorically, using it for effect as well as for clarity
- a willingness to be inventive with words and structures in order to produce a clearly identifiable style, even though at times the efforts may be too deliberate or may fall short of the writer’s intentions
B Grade
Demonstrates competence:
- an ability to absorb ideas and experience and to interpret them meaningfully in a context of the writer’s own conception
- a capacity to develop an idea with a clear sense of order
- a capacity to draw upon words adequate to express the writer’s own thoughts and feelings
- an ability to use mechanics as an integral part of the meaning and effect of the prose
- a capacity to consider alternate ways of expression as a means of making stylistic choices possible
C Grade
Suggests competence:
- a tendency to depend on the self-evident and the clichéd and thus for the writer to write uninformative discourse
- a tendency either to make the organization obvious or to write aimlessly without a plan
- a limitation in the range of words and thus a dependence on the clichés and colloquialisms most available
- an ability to use mechanics correctly or incorrectly in proportion to the plainness or complexity of the style
- a general unawareness of choices that affect style and thus an inability to control the effects a writer may seek
D Grade
Suggests incompetence
(F: Demonstrates incompetence)
- a tendency to exploit the obvious either because of a lack of understanding, inability to read, failure to grapple with a topic, or in many instances a lack of interest; substance of essays ranges from superficial to barren
- a tendency to wander aimlessly because of a lack of overall conception or in some instances to have a semblance of form without the development that makes the parts a whole
- a tendency to play safe with words, using ones the writer ordinarily speaks or the ones the writer can spell, placing obvious limits on variation of expression
- a frequent inability to make careful distinctions between periods, commas, and semicolons, although some writers in these categories can write correct sentences if they keep structures simple
- either a tendency to write highly convoluted sentences that are close to the rapid associations of our thoughts before we straighten them out or a tendency to play safe by avoiding the sentence elements that invite error (introductory modifiers, embedding, coordination, and various other sentence-combining techniques)